LILLEY: There’s Liberal media bias on the Hill but Akin isn’t problem

Article content material

The mud up on Parliament Hill between Pierre Poilievre and a member of the press gallery positive doesn’t look good.

Article content material

It’s an incident that performs proper into Poilievre’s narrative that the media are biased and out to get him, which, to be honest, lots of them are however not all and never the reporter in query.

Article content material

Let me be up entrance, the incident regarded horrible on the reporter in query, David Akin of World, however this isn’t a case of media bias — it was actually unhealthy judgment by Akin.

I’ve recognized Akin for greater than 15 years as a fellow journalist and labored with him in launching Solar Information Community the place he hosted a present and was the Parliamentary Bureau Chief for the community and Solar papers. He’s considered one of a handful of reporters on the Hill, together with individuals like Bob Fife on the Globe or Stephanie Levitz on the Star, who I consider as a straight shooter.

He famously broke the story on Trudeau taking the holiday to the Aga Khan’s island.

Together with his outburst on Tuesday although, Akin was excessive. He wouldn’t even let Poilievre ship his assertion earlier than he began yelling at him. Exterior of partisans, who already don’t like Poilievre, most individuals watching the alternate would assume Akin didn’t look good.

And that features Akin himself, who apologized later that day saying many viewers and readers mentioned he was impolite.

“I agree. I’m sorry for that. All of us need politicians to reply questions — however there are higher methods of constructing that time,” Akin posted to Twitter.

Article content material

The issue of a Liberal bias within the media could be very actual

Battles between the Parliamentary Press Gallery over entry to politicians and the flexibility to ask questions have been happening for years. I used to be there for the boycott and walkout on considered one of Stephen Harper’s information convention manner again in 2006 or so.

The issue is that as a bunch, the difficulty of entry actually solely turns into a problem when it’s Conservatives in energy. I can’t inform you what number of ineffective course of tales I’ve seen about how Harper would solely take 5 questions or would restrict the period of time he would spend.

You recognize who else does that with out all of the tales portray him out to be a foul man afraid of the media and democracy? Justin Trudeau.

But it is just a problem, solely turns into a significant story, if the Conservatives have limits.

Article content material

That’s one of many some ways the gallery reveals their bias, that and believing their job is to carry the opposition somewhat than the federal government to account. My warning to these complaining about media bias although is that it’s not everybody and it doesn’t occur for the explanations you assume.

There are lots of good reporters in each newsroom in Ottawa, sure, even CBC. Individuals additionally must know that any bias, actual or perceived, isn’t because of the media bailout fund, which newspapers get however TV networks don’t, it’s just because most journalists – consciously or unconsciously – agree with Liberal insurance policies and are skeptical of Conservatives.

There isn’t a grand scheme or plot, it’s simply the best way they’re, and till that adjustments it should give Poilievre loads of ammunition to assert he’s being picked on.

My recommendation to the journalists on the Hill is to be honest to the brand new Conservative chief, deal with him the identical as you’d deal with Trudeau. My recommendation to Poilievre is to appreciate he shouldn’t marketing campaign in opposition to all the gallery, he or his crew will want them sooner or later.

My prediction is each side will ignore me and we’re going to see a really hostile relationship because of the actions of each side within the coming years.

blilley@postmedia.com