Lisa LaFlamme’s quick exit from CTV a complex affair and clash of egos

Article content material

Was Lisa LaFlamme’s ouster at CTV a case of cleansing up a poisonous office? Was it attributable to an organization axe man clearing out high-priced expertise and establishing dominance? Did LaFlamme lastly pay the worth for her function in a expensive lawsuit?

Article content material

The reality seems to be that LaFlamme’s departure from the anchor chair of Canada’s most watched tv newscast was attributable to various advanced causes. These in search of a lower and dry story with an easy-to-hate villain or easy-to-love heroine shall be dissatisfied.

There have been claims of an abusive work surroundings created by LaFlamme. Others have claimed ageism and sexism have been the explanations Bell pushed her out.

After chatting with greater than a dozen sources who’ve or proceed to work on the group, together with those that have, till lately, labored with LaFlamme, this seems to be like a conflict of egos mixed with an organization hellbent on cost-cutting.

Supporters describe LaFlamme as skilled, keen about her job and caring, however now the sufferer of a chilly company tradition at Bell. Her detractors put her down as one other star whose dangerous behaviour lastly caught up with them.

Article content material

The parting of how is senseless from the surface. Her rankings have been stable, usually near 1 million folks, generally taking pictures as much as 1.2 million folks watching her newscast which was at all times within the prime 30 exhibits, in accordance with rankings company Numeris.

That’s far above what International pulls in and greater than double CBC’s rankings. In an business pushed by eyeballs, that makes her abrupt dismissal extra puzzling.

Weird departure

The circumstances round LaFlamme’s departure: she broke the information in a self-recorded video from her cottage that was posted to social media and tells us there may be extra to the story. In her personal phrases, LaFlamme was blindsided and mentioned CTV made what they labelled a enterprise resolution.

There was no huge ship off, not even an on-air goodbye. It was fast, chilly, and calculating.

Article content material

“You must ask?” mentioned one among LaFlamme’s now former colleagues when requested if her personal behaviour led to the departure.

Article content material

A number of sources, all former colleagues, described a poisonous work surroundings at CTV Information that began on the prime with LaFlamme and her senior producer Rosa Hwang, now additionally departed. Even one journalist who maintained that they’d solely skilled good issues with LaFlamme and Hwang mentioned they have been also known as the “imply women” within the newsroom.

“Once I began studying the tales in regards to the poisonous work surroundings on the Ellen DeGeneres present, it was like studying in regards to the CTV newsroom,” mentioned one supply.

This wasn’t my expertise with LaFlamme the few instances I’d interacted along with her through the years, however in these situations, she and I have been equals of types — each journalists working at competing retailers. I labored for Bell Media in Ottawa from 2016-19 and by no means even heard a whisper of gossip about this.

Article content material

Over time, the status of Hwang, LaFlamme’s proper hand, did unfold, and it wasn’t at all times type. Demeaning to journalists and editors within the newsroom was a frequent description.

As soon as LaFlamme was gone, although, the whispers obtained louder with claims that the anchor was harsh and condescending to the workers.

“I don’t discover her poisonous, she’s demanding, however she was the lead anchor for a nationwide newscast,” mentioned one longtime affiliate who described the encouraging emails or notes they might obtain from LaFlamme.

Even when all of the claims are true, and gossip is highest when persons are down, it wouldn’t be sufficient to pressure out somebody as excessive profile as LaFlamme. I don’t purchase that argument as Bell’s purpose for forcing her out, and as you will note, there may be purpose to doubt claims of a poisonous work surroundings have been behind efforts to take away Hwang from the CTV newsroom, as nicely.

Article content material

Was the writing on the wall?

Eight months in the past, Bell Media, which owns CTV, made a transfer that on reflection ought to have advised us larger modifications have been coming — Wendy Freeman departed as head of CTV Information. Whereas formally described as Freeman stepping down, contained in the business folks noticed the change for what it was.

Really useful Video

Michael Melling, the person who changed Freeman, is described in lower than flattering phrases by present and former Bell Media journalists. Politely, he’s referred to as an organization man or axe man for a purpose. He lower prices and was the pinnacle of reports when Bell laid off quite a few newsroom workers.

In accordance with former colleagues, Melling and LaFlamme undoubtedly didn’t see eye to eye.

Sources say it wasn’t simply budgets that they fought over, although that was a selected level of rivalry, it was additionally route and workers. In accordance with sources, Melling had tried to interrupt up the dynamic duo of LaFlamme and Hwang by transferring Hwang from producing CTV Nationwide Information to being the pinnacle of CP24 and the large native Toronto information division.

Article content material

If Hwang’s alleged function in making a “poisonous office” actually have been a purpose for shifting her out of the CTV newsroom with LaFlamme, why did Melling look to maneuver her over to a place overseeing one other massive and profitable information operation? Regardless, she didn’t need that job and made that identified.

Hwang pushed again — a number of sources mentioned she retained a lawyer to combat the transfer — whereas LaFlamme backed up her longtime affiliate. Sources say that, mixed with battles over how a lot to spend on protection of massive tales, just like the warfare in Ukraine, didn’t endear LaFlamme to the brand new boss.

As for claims that sexism was the rationale for pushing out LaFlamme, Melling’s try and put Hwang accountable for a extremely profitable operation calls that into query. As does the truth that he has appointed Ramneek Gill as the overall supervisor of CP24 and CTV Information Toronto and Sophia Skopelitis as basic supervisor of CTV Information Channel and BNN Bloomberg.

Article content material

Have been previous points a part of this resolution?

So why the push then? Why fireplace LaFlamme, the face of the community?

If Melling was the one behind LaFlamme’s departure, then understanding why Melling, a relative newcomer to CTV’s higher ranks, was capable of push out the star anchor of near a dozen years requires taking a look at occasions previously that seem to have soured LaFlamme’s relationship with the manager suite.

In 2015, longtime Bell govt Kevin Crull was thrown beneath the bus after the CTV newsroom, led by Freeman, LaFlamme and Hwang, in accordance with insiders, complained that he was interfering with their journalism. Crull had instructed newsrooms to not give Jean-Pierre Blais, then the chair of the CRTC, Canada’s broadcast regulator, airtime.

Article content material

That instruction was made public when the newsroom revolted at the concept that the manager in cost would have any say. Crull was proven the door inside days after spending years working his method up via Bell on their telephone and web facet, the facet the place most of their cash comes from.

The opposite incident was the story on Patrick Brown that resulted in him resigning as chief of Ontario’s Progressive Conservative Get together. Whereas CTV nonetheless says that they stand by their reporting, key info within the preliminary broadcast, which LaFlamme was intimately concerned in crafting, have been incorrect.

Article content material

It appears a protracted and protracted lawsuit — solely lately settled — didn’t assist LaFlamme’s standing at Bell among the many executives.

In earlier instances, somebody within the govt ranks may need stepped in to dam Melling or others from axing the face of the community — it didn’t occur this time. One former colleague mentioned the bean counters at Bell gained the argument on whether or not preserving LaFlamme was definitely worth the funding.

Was this all about saving cash?

Regardless of excessive rankings, it appears Bell wished to lose the large expense of her contract and discover another person who would do the job for what most of us would think about a good-looking sum, however nonetheless nicely under LaFlamme’s annual take.

LaFlamme’s supporters describe her as an old-fashioned journalist who at all times put the story first. At Bell Media lately, that doesn’t rely as a lot as saving cash does.

Article content material

My preliminary response to LaFlamme leaving the best way she did was that she deserved higher on her method out the door, particularly after 35 years, whatever the purpose. That continues to be the case, however in accordance with sources, she could have caught the community off guard along with her video posted to social media.

LaFlamme was anticipated to host CTV Nationwide on Monday, they needed to scramble to discover a last-minute substitute. Her everlasting substitute was away on trip, nowhere close to Toronto nor a CTV studio, forcing the community to scramble to get Omar Sachedina in entrance of a digital camera to talk to native associates throughout their newscasts about his launch on Sept. 5.

CTV insiders say they haven’t been briefed on the modifications or what route the newscast is taking sooner or later.

Appears that at this level, the ship that’s Canada’s greatest broadcast information platform stays rudderless and with no captain.

The Solar reached out to Bell Media, Michael Melling, Lisa LaFlamme and Rosa Hwang for remark. All of them declined or didn’t reply by deadline.