KINSELLA: Quebec and Alberta governments pose threat to Canadian unity

Article content material

Peace, order and good authorities.

Article content material

That’s a phrase utilized in part 91 of the British North America Act, which got here to be often called the Canadian Structure. It’s sort of imprecise, however it’s meant to explain the federal Parliament’s lawmaking authority over the provinces.

Article content material

More often than not, “peace, order and good authorities” doesn’t actually have a selected authorized which means. It’s a little bit of fanciful lawmaker poetry, actually. It’s just like the American “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” — or the French one, “liberty, equality, fraternity.” They’re theoretical ideas, not totally authorized ones.

As of this week, nevertheless, “peace, order and good authorities” — POGG, the students name it — is prone to grow to be fairly a bit much less theoretical. And all due to what has occurred in Quebec and Alberta.

Article content material

These two provinces have both re-elected a political social gathering (within the former) or chosen a political chief (within the latter) who pose an actual and manifest risk to the Canadian federation, and Canadian unity.

In their very own means, Quebec and Alberta have chosen to be led by ideologues whose mission is to toss a hand grenade on the federation, after which stroll away. To successfully render Canada — within the immortal phrases of Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now — an errand boy, despatched by clerks to gather payments.

Quebec first. There, 60% of the province voted this week towards the governing Coalition Avenir Quebec (CAQ). Regardless of that, the CAQ took 90 of the 125 seats within the so-called Nationwide Meeting. How is that potential, you ask? How can a celebration with so little assist — eligible voter turnout was round 40%, close to the lowest-ever — kind such a giant majority authorities?

Article content material

Good query. And, maybe, it wouldn’t matter a lot if the CAQ and its boss of bosses, François Legault, had been only a placeholder authorities. You recognize: accumulating taxes, passing the occasional bylaw or regulation, staying out of Quebeckers’ lives.

RECOMMENDED VIDEO

However Legault’s CAQ isn’t like that. They’re, as a substitute, essentially the most intrusive and interventionist authorities in Quebec’s historical past. They could fashion themselves as considerably conservative, however Legault and the CAQ are positively Stalinist of their willingness to control the non-public lives of residents — and for his or her enthusiasm for whittling away at Canada from the within.

Their language legislation, as an illustration, permits authorities apparatchiks to come back into non-public companies and break into residents’ non-public cellphones — to see what language they’re utilizing. Their legislation towards spiritual symbols, in the meantime, prevents the hiring of public servants who want to put on a small crucifix or Star of David round their neck.

Article content material

And their constitutional schemes are simply as bigoted. In June, Legault’s CAQ regime used a little-known part of the Structure, 45, to intestine minority rights in Quebec — and the federal Liberals and Conservatives did exactly nothing. Quebec was in a position to get its means with none debate, dissent or dialogue.

The Structure was modified, snap, similar to that. Now, the Structure Act says that “Quebeckers kind a nation.“ And: “French shall be the one official language of Quebec. It’s also the widespread language of the Quebec nation.“

Bear in mind the favored rebellion over the Meech Lake Accord? Bear in mind the precise referendum over the Charlottetown Accord? Bear in mind the way you spoke up, and anticipated your views to be revered?

Article content material

Properly, the political events in Ottawa don’t give a candy rattling what you consider the Structure, our supreme statute. They turned themselves into doormats for François and Legault and his CAQ. And Legault, re-elected to an enormous majority by a puny minority, guarantees rather more to come back.

That’s Quebec. Now Alberta.

There, this week, roughly 3% of my residence province’s inhabitants voted to pick the following premier. Three per cent! And, after simply two ballots, that minority selected Danielle Smith, a former speak radio host and failed political chief who has successfully promised to tear up the Structure and the Rule of Regulation.

Smith is telegenic and has a pleasant smile, certain. However beneath the sunny exterior is a political vandal, one who desires to set hearth to all of our constitutional and authorized norms. One who plans to rule Alberta like it’s like Legault’s Quebec — an “Alberta nation.”

Article content material

Her chosen car for doing so is her Alberta Sovereignty Act, which is simply what it says it’s: an act to make Alberta sovereign. Any federal legislation or court docket choice that Smith and her UCP dislike will merely be disregarded. Smith plans to go a legislation, in impact, that may place her and her political social gathering above the legislation.

Will the Prison Code, which is a federal legislation, apply in Alberta anymore? Will the prosecution of great drug offences, that are principally federal, now not occur? Will air and rail and freeway security legal guidelines be suspended? Contracts signed there? They’re all or partly federal jurisdiction, too.

Legault, one suspects, is disinterested in Canada, besides to carry out as his aforementioned errand boy. However he’s not silly. The quiet ease with which he defaced the Structure is proof.

Article content material

RECOMMENDED VIDEO

Smith, in the meantime, appears utterly clueless in regards to the implications of her “sovereignty” legislation. She’s type of the Patti Hearst of Canadian politics — a privileged, naive lady who has been persuaded to do horrible issues by capricious, craven males.

Will Legault get away with it? He already has. Solely time will inform if a Prime Minister Trudeau or Poilievre will rise up in his hind legs and oppose some future Legault scheme to disrupt peace, order and good authorities.

Smith, however, is simpler for Trudeau to cope with — he doesn’t have a lot to lose in Alberta. For Poilievre, nevertheless, Smith’s de facto Declaration of Independence presents an actual dilemma. Will probably be attention-grabbing to see what, if something, he says about it.

For the remainder of us, it signifies that what we expect — what we mentioned about Meech, how we voted in Charlottetown — is irrelevant. Ottawa doesn’t care what we expect.

And, because of this, Canada will proceed to be far, far lower than the sum of its elements.

— Kinsella was Jean Chretien’s Particular Assistant