BRAUN: Problem bigger than allegations against Q-107’s John Derringer

Article content material

The continuing practice wreck involving one more alleged high-profile bully and the corporate that protected him is throughout native media in Toronto — and it’s sadly acquainted turf.

Article content material

Who knew about John Derringer? When did they realize it? What did they do about it? What occurs subsequent?

Who will probably be fired?

There are umpteen examples of famed media folks alleged to be bullies or intercourse pests or tyrants or worse, and for each certainly one of them, there’s an organization defending them and their pursuits.

Over the previous few days, most people has heard descriptions of John Derringer’s alleged outbursts of rage and abuse involving a number of feminine co-workers — every of these ladies utterly above reproach, however thanks for asking.

The ladies’s accounts are such that you would virtually really feel sorry for the man; being out of a job when that is over seems to be the least of his worries.

What’s being described by these ladies isn’t your garden-variety mood tantrum, however one thing way more disturbing.

Article content material

What the ladies have claimed is that administration was lengthy conscious of an issue with Derringer however did little, regardless of the ladies making formal complaints to administration and to HR.

Jacqui Delaney, a former co-host who has posted on social media about this debacle, included a few information clippings from 20 years in the past decrying Derringer’s behaviour; one dubbed him “Instrument of the 12 months.”

Tragically, Derringer could nicely see himself because the sufferer in all this. If, as alleged, he’s been protected by administration all these years, he should be spinning — why are all these ladies saying unhealthy issues about him?

Didn’t the corporate simply give him a giant celebration for his 5,000th present final fall?

One former co-worker describes the assurances she had from the corporate — as she was leaving — that they took it critically, that they’d be retaining Derringer on a brief leash, that it could by no means occur once more.

Article content material

“It was all bull—-. I used to be advised, ‘That is clearly damaged, and we should repair it,’ however in truth, they only discovered to cover it higher,” she mentioned.

It is going to be fascinating to see who will get picked as designated fall-guy at headquarters.

Simply to assist everybody sustain, listed here are some explanations to look at for that may come from varied company individuals who ought to know higher:

1) “It was a unique time.”

Doubtful as this excuse could also be, Corus may get away with utilizing it, if the alleged behaviour occurred 20 years in the past. However Jennifer Valentyne, whose video prompted this outpouring, was at Q-107 from 2017-19, only a few years in the past.

Reference to a unique time or period usually precedes a bald-faced lie. Persons are just about the identical all through human historical past, and never in a great way.

Article content material

2) “We had no concept this was happening.”

That’s not going to fly on this case. What’s apparent is that many have identified, and for a few years.

Ditto: “We take these issues very critically,” “Zero tolerance,” “Our staff come first,” “No person spoke up,” and so forth.

3) “Effectively, — the inventive nature might be tough.”

Simply FYI, “he’s an artist,” and, “the inventive temperament,” and related expressions are all code for bad-tempered, egotistical, unacceptable behaviour.

Somebody has posted, “Hope heads roll at Corus,” on social media; that appears to be the present tackle this.

Guess we’ll discover out.